<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2012: Science Or Superstition &#187; End of the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2012sos.net/tag/end-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2012sos.net</link>
	<description>The Definitive Guide to Doomsday Phenomenon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Roland Emmerich Planning &#8216;2012&#8242; Sequel as TV Series Called &#8216;2013&#8242;</title>
		<link>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/11/roland-emmerich-planning-2012-sequel-as-tv-series-called-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/11/roland-emmerich-planning-2012-sequel-as-tv-series-called-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2012 Co-Producer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2012sos.net/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first read this, I thought it was a joke. How do you have a sequel when you destroy the world? Let the post-apocalyptic fun begin.
Meredith Woerner writes on io9.com:
Just seconds after telling us that he makes disaster movies because he hates sequels, director Roland Emmerich spilled all about his new ABC TV series [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read this, I thought it was a joke. How do you have a sequel when you destroy the world? Let the post-apocalyptic fun begin.</p>
<p>Meredith Woerner writes on <a href="http://io9.com/5398037/roland-emmerich-on-2012-sequel-its-lost-meets-district-9">io9.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just seconds after telling us that he makes disaster movies because he hates sequels, director Roland Emmerich spilled all about his new ABC TV series <em>2013</em>, that picks up after the waves part. It sounds epic. Spoiler warning.</p>
<p>At the end of 2012 the cast members who have survived the massive floods and volcanic destruction on Earth head over to Africa, the new center of the world. What happens next has just been picked up by ABC as a television series that Emmerich is helping out with. We got the chance to find out more about his post-post-apocalypse series at the <em><a href="http://www.whowillsurvive2012.com">2012</a></em> press day. (More on <a href="http://io9.com/5398037/roland-emmerich-on-2012-sequel-its-lost-meets-district-9">io9.com</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <em><a href="http://www.whowillsurvive2012.com">2012</a></em> trailer, yeah, I&#8217;d want to be alive after this happens&#8230;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="295" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hz86TsGx3fc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="295" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hz86TsGx3fc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/11/roland-emmerich-planning-2012-sequel-as-tv-series-called-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013: Or, What to Do When the Apocalypse Doesn’t Arrive</title>
		<link>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/2013-or-what-to-do-when-the-apocalypse-doesn%e2%80%99t-arrive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/2013-or-what-to-do-when-the-apocalypse-doesn%e2%80%99t-arrive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2012 SOS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Lachman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2012sos.net/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A post from our parent site, disinformation:
Gary Lachman is the author of several well-respected occult-themed books (including the Disinformation book Turn Off Your Mind: The Mystic Sixties and the Dark Side of the Age of Aquarius). He asked us to run his take on the 2012 phenomenenon (the essay was originally published in EnlightenNext Magazine):
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post from our parent site, <a href="http://www.disinfo.com/2009/10/2013-or-what-to-do-when-the-apocalypse-doesn%E2%80%99t-arrive/">disinformation</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Gary Lachman is the author of several well-respected occult-themed books (including the Disinformation book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0971394237?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=disinformation&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0971394237">Turn Off Your Mind: The Mystic Sixties and the Dark Side of the Age of Aquarius</a>). He asked us to run his take on the 2012 phenomenenon (the essay was originally published in <a href="http://www.enlightennext.org/magazine/j44/lachman.asp?page=1">EnlightenNext Magazine</a>):</em></p>
<p>The belief in a coming end of the world as we know it may seem understandable to people living in the first decade of the twenty-first century, but a look at history shows that it has been part of Western psychology from the beginning.</p>
<p>The central figure of Western religion, Jesus Christ, told his followers that the end was nigh, and most people who accepted Jesus believed that the cosmic last call would come in their lifetime. Yet Jesus worked within an age-old Jewish tradition that looked to the coming of the Messiah, a religious and political leader who would set the world to rights and, incidentally, free the Chosen People from whomever it was who had conquered them at the time. As Jesus didn’t free the Jews from the Romans—nor seemed able to free himself from them either—the Jews who denied him seem justified in their disbelief. To them, and to the Romans, the Christians who preached a coming Day of Judgment were rather like the urban oracles who inhabit most major cities today, ranting on street corners and pestering passersby to repent.</p>
<p>Post-Jesus, the Jews didn’t give up their anticipation of a Messiah. They merely pushed back the date of his arrival, a tactic the Christians soon adopted as well when it became clear that Jesus’ Second Coming—after his crucifixion and resurrection—was delayed. The last major claimant to Messiahdom was the Turkish Jew Sabbatai Zevi, who, after gathering a huge following, ignominiously abandoned his call in 1666 when threatened with impalement by Sultan Mehmet IV. As did later students of eschatology (the study of the end times), the early Christian theorists were adept in cooking the books and explaining why their own final curtain hadn’t yet fallen. Nevertheless, against all the evidence, the belief in some once-and-for-all denouement remained strong. In 156 AD, for example, a Phrygian named Montanus declared that he was the incarnation of the Holy Spirit and that, in accordance with the Fourth Gospel, he would reveal “things to come,” such as the imminent arrival of Christ’s kingdom, which would physically descend from the heavens and transform Phrygia into a land of saints. Understandably, thousands of Christians flocked to Phrygia to await the Second Coming. Yet again, the expected kingdom’s failure to arrive did little to dampen the belief that it would eventually show up. After Montanus, there were several other false alarms, all of which ended in the same way.</p>
<p>[continues at <a href="http://www.disinfo.com/2009/10/2013-or-what-to-do-when-the-apocalypse-doesn%E2%80%99t-arrive/">disinfo.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/2013-or-what-to-do-when-the-apocalypse-doesn%e2%80%99t-arrive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New End of the World Date: Not 2012, Not 2036, Now it’s 2068!</title>
		<link>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/a-new-end-of-the-world-date-not-2012-not-2036-now-it%e2%80%99s-2068/</link>
		<comments>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/a-new-end-of-the-world-date-not-2012-not-2036-now-it%e2%80%99s-2068/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>2012 SOS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apophis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near Earth Objects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2012sos.net/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rachel Courtland writes in New Scientist that the asteroid Apophis, previously thought to be on course for impact with Earth in 2036, is now more likely to hit us in 2068.
Alexandra Bruce writes about Apophis and other Near Earth Objects (NEOs) that we may like to worry about in the book 2012: Science or Superstition.
From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Courtland <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17942-fresh-impact-risks-for-asteroid-poster-child.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&#038;nsref=spacehttp://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17942-fresh-impact-risks-for-asteroid-poster-child.html">writes in New Scientist</a> that the asteroid Apophis, previously thought to be on course for impact with Earth in 2036, is now more likely to hit us in 2068.</p>
<p>Alexandra Bruce writes about Apophis and other Near Earth Objects (NEOs) that we may like to worry about in the book <a href="http://www.2012sos.net/the-book/">2012: Science or Superstition</a>.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17942-fresh-impact-risks-for-asteroid-poster-child.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&#038;nsref=spacehttp://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17942-fresh-impact-risks-for-asteroid-poster-child.html">New Scientist</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The chances of the asteroid Apophis hitting Earth in 2036 are lower than we thought. But those worried about deep impacts should add a new entry to their calendar: 2068.</p>
<p>When Apophis was first spotted in 2004, the 250-metre-wide rock was briefly estimated to have a 2.7 per cent chance of hitting Earth in 2029. Further observations quickly showed that it will miss Earth that year – but should it pass through a 600-metre-wide &#8220;keyhole&#8221; in space, it will return to hit Earth in 2036.</p>
<p>For the past several years, the probability of such a collision has been considered to be 1 in 45,000. But new calculations suggest the chance of an impact in 2036 is far lower – about 1 in 250,000.</p>
<p>The revised estimate is in part a result of additional observations of the asteroid as well as refinements on the position of Apophis in older data&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.2012sos.net/2009/10/a-new-end-of-the-world-date-not-2012-not-2036-now-it%e2%80%99s-2068/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
